Now Reading
Why I No Longer Recommend Murakami

Why I No Longer Recommend Murakami

It is not that the meaning cannot be explained. But there are certain meanings that are lost forever the moment they are explained in words.

Haruki Murakami, 1Q84
In the beginning, he was my go-to recommendation when people asked for recommendations but over time I realized that I’m blindly recommending a writer to anyone who seemed to have similar reading choices and also to those who seemed to be adventurous enough.

I’m going to attempt to explain what I feel about a few things you can expect in a Murakami book. I’m using 1Q84 as the prime example as it’s my favourite book and it’s very much a typical Murakami.

Open Endings
Surely Murakami (or any other writer) is not for everyone but Murakami especially is not someone whose writing will be understood by everyone.

There will be open endings and for some who read (for example) 1Q84, the feeling of closure might feel very important after reading a trilogy worth 1400 pages. You would end up saying ‘Well, what was the point?’ My answer is pretty simple, most of Murakami’s books are about experiences. Something like not caring about the destination and enjoying the journey
instead.

I faced a similar problem with Neil Gaiman’s Neverwhere. Although it had an ending, I felt that Neil Gaiman used magic realism just to get away with the story in the end. It wasn’t Neil Gaiman’s writing or the story that didn’t connect, it was more to do with how I approached/experienced the book. I didn’t enjoy the journey so I was looking for at least an ending that would make the journey worth it.

Support Our Journalism

You are reading this because you value quality and serious journalism.

But, serious journalism needs serious support. We need readers like you to support us and pay for making quality and independent journalism more vibrant.

Atmosphere
I remember a passage in 1Q84 where Murakami goes on to say why cabbage should be kept in the fridge. What’s the point? There isn’t. Or is there? What is the point of anything anyway? Why does an author need to build a world when writing fantasy? Why does an author feel the need to tell us what colour shirt a character is wearing? These are all tools to give an atmospheric feeling.

With Murakami, it’s in the details. What may seem random and pointless actually will play an important part in building the mood of the story which brings me to his signature of food scenes.

Food and Flavor
People, in general, have curious habits and none come as close as food. I might forget a lot of details about my friends from college but I do remember a lot of their eating habits. Some of my friends would always want non-vegetarian, others couldn’t stand it. Some would only drink coffee, and some were partial to tea. These are things that define a lot of our relationship dynamics. We eat thrice a day (or at least two, I know a lot of us to skip breakfast ) So to me, if you tell me about someone’s eating habits, a lot can be deciphered from it. I’m not saying that I’ll be able to tell what type of a person they are but it helps in understanding a little bit more about them. It’s something they do multiple times a day, every single day of their life. It makes sense to use food as tools to define characters.

Movement
One thing that might skip a lot of readers is that there is almost a constant feeling of movement in Murakami’s books. There is a regular change in setting. Characters walk around a lot. They meet other characters on the go. They sit in a lot at cafes. This is something that keeps you engaged. These are the things that keep the reader thinking. They enrich the whole storytelling experience.

Cats
Recently, my wife and I moved to a new apartment. Soon after that, my sister had to go travelling so we brought Gatsby (our cat) home to take care of her. The whole mood of our place has changed. It’s like there’s more life (literally and figuratively) in our home now. The inclusion of cats in Murakami’s books is almost a given. And I feel that what this does is give additional life to the situation, adds another perspective. Is the cat absolutely necessary to the plot? You might think not. But it definitely sets up the mood and adds a dimension to the protagonist.

See Also

What’s on their minds?
I’ll try and wrap up with one of my favourite aspects of a Murakami novel. He goes deep down into the minds of the characters. Little thoughts in his protagonist’s minds are laid out over the course of his books. You’ll find a lot of middle-aged protagonists who are more or fewer loners. By the end you will feel like you know them inside out, you know their deepest fears and what will bring them happiness. This is very apparent in his much-acclaimed book, Norwegian Wood. So even though you might feel the plot isn’t fast enough or haphazard in nature, there will be a feeling of progress
when it comes to knowing his characters.

If this intrigues you, go for one of the following books:
1- A Wild Sheep Chase
2- Men Without Women (short stories)
3- Norwegian Wood.


This Opinion was published in the February 2020 print issue of The Mountain Ink.

To help us strengthen the tradition of quality reading and writing, we need allies like YOU. Subscribe to us.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Mountain Ink is now on Telegram. Subscribe here.

Become Our Ally

To help us strengthen the tradition of quality reading and writing, we need allies like YOU. Subscribe to us.

View Comment (1)
  • But why is it a necessity to always group fictions under one genre. I understand Murakami, is not for everyone to understand or maybe if we put it in this way we can say high brow people can like Murakami more than Chetan Bhagat. But the point is Murakami is a genre in it’s own. It doesn’t have to read along with other narratives just to make sense. For that matter even Marquez, Kafka or Pualo Coehlo have different tangents of writing and which are best in their own way.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

© 2019-2022 Mountain Ink. All Rights Reserved.

Scroll To Top